Can We Know What Animals Are Thinking?
The inner lives of other species.
The inner lives of other species.
The Economist Oct 2015 20min Permalink
How artist Petr Pavlensky uses his body and the Russian legal system as canvases.
Noah Sneider The Economist May 2016 Permalink
Barack Obama on Africa, Putin and the gap between what CEOs tell him over lunch and what they tell their lobbyists.
John Micklethwait, Edward Carr The Economist Aug 2014 20min Permalink
Resurrecting a legendary typeface.
The Economist Dec 2013 10min Permalink
A day in the economic life of the Nairobi’s Kibera, the largest shanty-town in Africa.
The Economist Dec 2012 15min Permalink
A meditation on Hell.
The Economist Dec 2012 10min Permalink
The secretive financial behemoth that is the American Catholic Church.
The Economist Aug 2012 15min Permalink
On the utility of euphemisms:
In the upper reaches of the British establishment, euphemism is a fine art, one that new arrivals need to master quickly. “Other Whitehall agencies” or “our friends over the river” means the intelligence services (American spooks often say they “work for the government”). A civil servant warning a minister that a decision would be “courageous” is saying that it will be career-cripplingly unpopular. “Adventurous” is even worse: it means mad and unworkable. A “frank discussion” is a row, while a “robust exchange of views” is a full-scale shouting match. (These kind of euphemisms are also common in Japanese, where the reply maemuki ni kento sasete itadakimasu—I will examine it in a forward-looking manner—means something on the lines of “This idea is so stupid that I am cross you are even asking me and will certainly ignore it.”)
The Economist Dec 2011 Permalink
How Viennese psychologist Ernest Dichter transformed advertising:
What makes soap interesting? Why choose one brand over another? Dichter’s first contract was with the Compton Advertising Agency, to help them sell Ivory soap. Market research typically involved asking shoppers questions like “Why do you use this brand of soap?” Or, more provocatively, “Why don’t you use this brand of soap?” Regarding such lines of inquiry as useless, Dichter instead conducted a hundred so-called “depth interviews”, or open-ended conversations, about his subjects’ most recent scrubbing experiences. The approach was not unlike therapy, with Dichter mining the responses for encoded, unconscious motives and desires. In the case of soap, he found that bathing was a ritual that afforded rare moments of personal indulgence, particularly before a romantic date (“You never can tell,” explained one woman). He discerned an erotic element to bathing, observing that “one of the few occasions when the puritanical American [is] allowed to caress himself or herself [is] while applying soap.” As for why customers picked a particular brand, Dichter concluded that it wasn’t exactly the smell or price or look or feel of the soap, but all that and something else besides—that is, the gestalt or “personality” of the soap.
The Economist Dec 2011 15min Permalink
On Bitcoin, the world’s first “decentralized digital currency.”
The Economist Jun 2011 10min Permalink
The anatomy of a scandal.
- The Economist May 2011 10min Permalink
On the evolution of Nigeria’s booming film industry, which produces 50 full-length features a week.
- The Economist Dec 2010 10min Permalink
Western execs on what it’s like to be taken over by a Chinese firm.
The Economist Nov 2010 10min Permalink